Native Intelligence:
a column by
Jack D. Forbes
Native American Studies
University of California,
Davis
COMPENSATING
WORKERS
WHO
ARE UNWAGED
Many workers are
not waged. This is due primarily to the fact that most unwaged work has been
predominantly "female work" such as caring for children, the aged,
and handicapped or convalescent persons. Reservations and other Native
communities include large numbers of unwaged workers. (The so-called high
unemployment rates on reservations are partly a fiction, since most adults and
many youth are employed but are unpaid).
The failure to
compensate such workers has many negative results. The unpaid individuals are,
of course, monetarily deprived or are forced to apply for "welfare"
or "general assistance" rather than being waged. Instead of being
recognized as valuable "social workers," such caregivers are often
denigrated and forced, in effect, to subsidize the rest of society with their
unpaid labor while being treated as "deviants" placed under the
control of often hostile bureaucratic agencies (whose rules are determined by
male-dominated legislative bodies or the federal government).
Why should
hard-working caregivers be forced, under increasingly harsh conditions, to ask
for support instead of wages?
Another negative
result of the above system is that unwaged workers do not contribute to Social
Security or retirement plans and, therefore, have no pension of their own
available at retirement time. This is a major form of discrimination and
undoubtedly violates international human rights law (as well as constitutional
"equal protection" rights). Caregivers, after a life of often hard
work, are sometimes forced to live in poverty when old and infirm because of
not having been paid for their work.
Caregivers are
also often forced to go without health insurance, unless, of course, they have
a spouse with enough income to pay their share of the premium. To be without
health insurance, life insurance, etc., is to be placed in the position of
being damaged healthwise and losing years from one's potential life span. Such
jeopardy is certainly a violation of human rights and equal protection
principles. "Mother's Day" once each year hardly makes up for such
jeopardy!
It is not enough
to say that married couples are taken care of if the "breadwinner"
earns enough to feed the caregiver and dependents. If a breadwinner earns $10
per hour but has to share that income with two persons instead of one the wage
has been immediately reduced to $5 per hour apiece, and if there are two
dependents in addition, then $10 may be divided by 4, giving $2.50 per hour
apiece.
Such income
levels are incredible in an era in which CEO's are paid from $1,000 to $35,000
or more per hour! A dependent in a CEO's family might have from $300 per hour
(and up) to meet health, educational, shelter, food, and entertainment needs,
as opposed to $2.50 per hour for a dependent in a more-than-minimum-wage
worker's family. Hardly "rugged individualism" for the CEO's
dependents!
The above
situation has forced large numbers of women to seek waged work outside of the
home, and thus the dependents in the household are left without anyone to care
for them during the greater part of the day. Also in a two-outside-worker
household, both waged workers are often too tired in the evening to supervise
youth or to engage in any kind of valuable educational or recreational
activities. The results certainly show up on a daily basis, with juvenile
delinquency and social/educational problems of an increasingly alarming nature.
The fiscal and social cost is immense!
The forced entry
of both parents into the job market also contributes to a surplus of labor,
especially at the lower-waged levels of employment, and has the effect (I would
argue) of lowering wages and weakening worker solidarity. This, in turn,
contributes further to the extreme distortion in the distribution of incomes
which we have been seeing since the late 1970's.
What should we
do? First, we should stop collecting income tax from persons earning less than
the poverty level. (I would personally like to see the first $25,000 of the
income of small businesses and small farms tax-free, in order to encourage
small enterprises, and at least the first $15,000 of all waged worker's salary
tax-free, or perhaps $25/30,000 per couple).
Second, let us
find a way to record the hours worked by unwaged caregivers, with voluntary
participation by the latter. Then let us pay each caregiver perhaps $10 per
hour for care work. This could include raising children, doing housework, providing
transportation, caring for older persons, caring for mentally-retarded persons,
doing the shopping for the infirm, and so on.
If a father
spends 4 hours per day at caring for a school-age child, then 4x365=1460x$10 or
$14,600 per year. A great side effect of this approach may well be to eliminate
the need for much assisted-living care in institutions for older persons and to
also cut down greatly on the need for day-care for children. It would be a
positive gain to have families and other loved ones caring for both children
and elders.
We would have to
build in safeguards against having children solely to qualify as a caregiver
(such as no increased income for a third child. Perhaps also the dependent
deduction on the income tax can be phased out after a second child).
The
federal government can certainly afford such a compensation plan: (1) by
eliminating corporate welfare; or (2) by restoring corporate and upper-income
taxes to their pre-Reagan levels; (3) by tremendous savings in education,
juvenile detention, probation, prisons, rehabilitation, and police work; (4) by
huge savings in the social welfare system; and (5) by savings in long-term-care
of the elderly and handicapped.
And for all you
conservatives out there, remember that paying people for work performed is not
a form of socialism, but a great example of free enterprise capitalism at work.
(March 19, 2000)
[Professor Jack D. Forbes, Powhatan-Delaware, is the author of COLUMBUS
AND OTHER CANNIBALS, RED BLOOD, AFRICANS AND NATIVE AMERICANS, AZTECAS DEL
NORTE and other books.] All Rights Reserved by Jack D. Forbes. Phone:(916)
752-3626/3237; Fax: (916) 752-7097
30